NOTICE

I'll be on holiday from 29 August to 15 September, after which I'll resume my regular posting on this blog. If you'd like to republish any of my articles, you are welcome to do so, with a link to the original post on my blog.

Thursday, 19 December 2013

For Sexual Relativism and Homophilia the Tide Is Turning




There are undoubted similarities between Muslim activists on one hand and LGBT and feminist activists on the other.

Both groups want to impose their views - and now, with same-sex marriage, laws - on everybody else.

And both react badly when they don't succeed.

At the moment, as I previously wrote, the trend towards total normalisation of homosexuality is experiencing a setback. Maybe people start having enough of it, and are waking up.

The above video shows events on 23rd-25th November, when a loud and threatening mob attempted to storm the Cathedral of San Juan Bautista (John the Baptist) in Argentina.

In the video, 7,000 lesbian and pro-abortion feminists mock, abuse, spray-paint, sexually harass, spit on and physically assault 1,500 young Catholic men just for forming a human shield, standing and praying around their own Cathedral, so that the activists could not storm in, desecrate and ransack it. Displaying their "tolerance", the feminists spray-paint writings the nicest of which is "Burn the church".

Then they burn an effigy of Argentinian-born Pope Francis. The similarity of behaviour with Muslim crowds is astonishing. The feminist, LGBT mob even ululates, as Muslim women do. Savagery replicates barbarism.

Many other similar attacks have been perpetrated against Christians, churches and other Christian symbols by homosexual activists, feminists and - guess whom - Muslims. Assaults that, had they been directed against the perpetrators themselves, would have been called "hate crimes", but committing them against Christians, for some inexplicable reason, makes them OK.

In Croatia, on 1st December people voted in a referendum to support the definition “marriage is matrimony between a man and a woman”, definition which will now become part of the country's constitution. 450,000 petition signatures were necessary to call for the referendum, but the pro-family campaigners collected 750,000 in only two weeks in a country of about 4.4 million (this would be the equivalent of getting 54 million signatures in the United States).

Two thirds of the electorate voted in favour of this new Constitutional Amendment: 66% to 34%. Liberty Counsel website elaborates and accuses:
Earlier this year, the Croatian government drafted a bill that would create homosexual “life partners.” Recognizing this as a step towards same-sex marriage, the Catholic Church organized the citizens’ referendum. The citizens stood strong against government, media, and even international pressure.

“The Obama administration is working to undermine marriage and family around the world,” said Mat Staver, Founder and Chairman of Liberty Counsel.

According to a White House fact sheet outlining President Obama’s actions, Advancing LGBT Rights at Home and Abroad, the Obama administration is actively proliferating homosexuality around the world:

• Working with the Global Equality Fund, LGBT Global Development Partnership, and government and private-sector partners to train LGBT leaders;

• Working with our embassies overseas and civil society on the ground to develop strategies to advance LGBT status in countries around the world;

• Supporting resolutions specific to LGBT issues;

• Cosponsoring the UN Human Rights Council resolution on LGBT rights; and

• Ensuring that LGBT persons are included in broader human rights resolutions.

In 2014 the United States will host an international conference of homosexual donors and activists to coordinate and strategize LGBT international public policy initiatives.

“The memories of so-called ‘progressive’ regimes controlling society are fresh in the minds of Eastern Europeans. They know if the people stand united, they can overcome these ‘progressive’ ideals that wreak havoc on families and communities,” Staver points out. Croatia joins Serbia, Montenegro, Poland, Hung[a]ry, Lithuania, Bulgaria, and Latvia in passing laws to affirm natural marriage.

“President Obama’s anticolonial ideology is shrinking America’s influence in national political affairs, but he is a colonist when it comes to forcing his anti-God and anti-values ideology upon foreign countries. Obama’s ideology is morally bankrupt and anti-American,” says Staver. [Emphasis added]
Indeed, Eastern European countries, although generally poorer than their Western counterparts, seem to be more politically aware and intelligent than those. Having experienced socialism (for Marx, the first stage towards communism) and a communist government, they know what those evils really are like, and correctly recognise Western "liberal" agendas in various areas, from the welfare state to the normalisation of homosexuality (not to mention transexuality), as different faces of the same monster they knew in the bad old days.

In Croatia, the referendum campaign came in response to proposals by the current Leftist government to extend marriage-like benefits to homosexual partners. Having witnessed what happened in the West, where this kind of stealth approach has led to homomarriage and same-sex couples' adoption rights - and we haven't seen the end of the process yet -, the Christian, pro-family activists have been endowed, so to speak, with the power of prediction and been able to stop this train of events before desensitisation stepped in and it became too late.

Similar story in Slovenia, Croatia’s neighbour which shares borders with Italy and Austria. In March 2012 the people of Slovenia rejected Leftist social engineering by repealing a new “Family Code” adopted the year before by the Slovenian Parliament, which would have cleared the path towards complete equalisation of the homosexual and conjugal marriage and towards homosexual child-adoption. It was the first referendum of this kind in an EU member state, and is likely to become an important point of reference for any further legislation in this area in Central Europe.

The piece "Croatia: post-communist nomenklatura wants to re-define marriage, but civil society resists", written before the Croatian referendum, explains:
In both Slovenia and Croatia, the debate around so-called “LGBT rights” evidences the growing disconnection between the ruling classes (which, due to their lack of genuine moral and intellectual qualities, one would hesitate to describe as “elites”) and the population. In both countries, politics and economy are under the control of a small – mostly ex-communist – nomenklatura seeking to ingratiate itself with the influential pressure-groups that currently act as opinion-makers throughout the greater part of Western and Northern Europe. These elites believe that, in order to be worthy members of the EU, their countries need to recognize same-sex “marriages”, and be it against the declared will of the people.

The nomenklatura’s contempt for democracy becomes apparent in a statement by the country’s president Ivo Josipović, a former communist, who said he had doubts “whether we need such a referendum”. The Minister of Social Politics and Youth, Milanka Opačić, called the referendum “expensive and completely unnecessary”. In addition, the Prime Minister of Croatia, Zoran Milanović, called the referendum “completely pointless” and said that “this will be the first and last time that such a referendum is announced”.

Pointless? Yes, because the government appears determined to simply ignore the outcome of the plebiscite. The Minister or [sic] Public Administration, Arsen Bauk, has defiantly announced that, in case the referendum is successful (and the introduction of same-sex marriages thus becomes impossible), a new bill will be drawn up to grant homosexual partnerships the same legal rights as marriages. Since the fall of Communism, one has never seen a Croatian politician treating a democratic expression of the electorate’s will with such arrogance.

However, arrogance and brazen contempt for democracy are by now known to be the trademarks of the homosexualist lobby. It suffices to remember the way in which the French government violently cracked down on the peaceful participants of a demonstration against the re-definition of marriage, or the fact that the European Commission funds the budget of ILGA-Europe, a radical homosexualist lobby group, with more than 1 million Euro of taxpayer’s money every year – a contribution without which this fake “non-governmental organization” would simply cease to exist.

But in the meantime, the real civil society is slowly awakening. The foreseeable outcome of the referendum in Croatia will provide further encouragement. [Emphasis added]
I conclude with Matt Barber, who writes in WND's article "America's chief export: Immorality":
Indeed, under this president, America’s chief export has become immorality. Sexual deviancy, murder of the unborn, redistribution of wealth and other evils have been sanitized and propagandized as “basic human rights.”

Thus, when this arrogant man stands before the U.N. and decries those nations that refuse to embrace his special brand of pagan relativism, we shouldn’t be surprised if those nations push back.

And so they push back...

For instance, there has been, of late, great weeping and gnashing of teeth among mainstream media – and other circles of intolerant “tolerance” – over successful efforts by several foreign governments to stem the tide of “LGBT” propaganda within their own sovereign borders.

Russia, India, Croatia, Peru, Jamaica and even Australia, for instance, along with other nations, are now moving to inoculate themselves from the fast-metastasizing cancer of sexual relativism.

Having witnessed, from afar, the poisonous results of such propaganda here in the U.S. (the hyper-sexualization of children, the deconstruction of natural marriage and family, the rampant spread of sexually transmitted disease, religious persecution and the like), there seems an emerging global recognition that the radical “LGBT” agenda – a pet cause of Obama’s – is not about securing “human rights,” but, rather, is about promulgating moral wrongs.

The world is finding that forcing others to “tolerate” – indeed, to celebrate – unfettered licentiousness, under penalty of law, is as harmful to society as is said licentiousness to those who practice it...

While America may be lost (though I pray not), it would seem that her traditional values – values still shared by many, if not most, of the American people – are, nonetheless, gaining momentum abroad.

And that is encouraging.

Now let’s pray those values come full circle.

7 comments:

  1. God-hater Obama is a Marxist Muslim homosexual. Obama uses America's significant power seeking to destroy everything that is good, decent and wholesome in this world. Some people think Obama is the anti-Christ!

    America was once a shining city on a hill. America's light shone to the whole world. How dim that light has become. The light is almost gone now.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This was also reported on an article on Frontpagemag Violent Feminists Attack Argentinian Cathedral http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/mark-tapson/violent-feminists-attack-argentinian-cathedral/

    I commented on the above article:
    '1500 Catholic men formed a human shield to peacefully protect it (the Cathedral) The men found themselves beset by a raging, Christian-hating, “Encounter that reportedly numbered about 7000.'

    Argentinian MEN, you are BEAUTIFUL! Thank you so much for your wonderful stand for God and Christianity!

    I am deeply shocked that the police REFUSED to intervene and stop the 7,000 demonic monster women from their filthy, depraved attacks on the men who refused to raise a hand against the wicked, violent women. Because they are men and their perverted attackers are women the police refuse to do their duty and protect men?
    'The police who were present reportedly told the media that they were unable to intervene because “they are women.”' The entire nation should be protesting.

    ReplyDelete
  3. In America, Operation Rescue in the nineties was made up of both Catholics and Protestants. Made up mostly of both whites and hispanics. The pro-aborts were extremely aggressive!

    Operation Rescue was made up of people who did sidewalk counseling outside abortion clinics, offering women who went into abortion clinics, HELP. Pro-life sidewalk counselors who did not participate in 'Rescues', FULLY SUPPORTED Operation Rescue and 'Rescues'.

    Many unmarried, pregnant women endure intense pressure from friends, boyfriends and parents to have an abortion. They are in desperate need of support and help.

    When pro-life sidewalk counselors spoke to the women going into abortion clinics to offer help, the pro-aborts would scream and blow whistles to drown out the voices of pro-life sidewalk counselors.

    WOMEN MUST HAVE THE HUMAN RIGHT TO GIVE BIRTH TO THE CHILDREN THEY CARRY!

    There was an alliance of radical feminists and the homosexual males of 'Act Up. Act Up along with the feminists came out to the abortion clinics and Operation 'Rescues.'

    ReplyDelete
  4. Enza makes good observations although, as with illegal Mexicans stealing jobs and sexually assaulting women in the U.S. make us feel hostile, she feels hostility toward Muslims doing the same things in Europe. But who has facilitated the entry of Muslims into Europe. Was it Europeans? Or another primitive religious group (I would call it a gang of organized crime) with a Mid Eastern outpost she dares not mention? Unlike Muslims, it is illegal to criticize this group.

    ReplyDelete
  5. To Anonymous: I don't understand your post. Why don't you wish to name what you call a "Mid Eastern outpost" and then make the ridiculous, insulting assertion that Enza "dares not mention" it. Your post is written in such a way it is difficult to know what group you are referring to or what exactly you are writing about.

    U.S. borders are deliberately left unguarded by the U.S. government allowing dangerous criminals, murderers, rapists, drug cartels and worst of all, Muslim terrorists (and weapons of mass destruction) to easily cross the border.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Linda, the "Anonymous" above is quite clearly referring to the Jews, and the old conspiracy that a criminal cabal of godless rootless cosmopolitan Jewish financiers are responsible for open borders, deliberately tolerating illegal immigration to swamp the white West and overcome its resistance to one-world tyranny. This anti-Semitic theory is held by many hard right anti-NWO folk- but not me. The "Mid Eastern outpost" is Israel. It seems far more plausible to me that the elite class of Europeans did indeed gain sufficient popular backing for lax immigration policy and the social tabooing of nationalism precisely because of the understandable desire to avoid the conditions for another world war and/or Holocaust (though the conspiracist above may well prefer "Holo-hoax" or similar revisionist language) and then that sense of unity and tolerance has been pushed too far for various reasons and by various elite groups- certainly some individuals in them may be Jewish, though I would not see the Jews as a group as behind things.

    Any laws classifying hate speech against religious groups or defamation would include Jews and Muslims equally, and in recent times the PC lobby appear to be more focused on stamping out "Islamophobia" than anti-Semitism.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Enza, claiming that Muslim activists share the same traits as LGBT and feminist activists is way off the mark. LGBT and feminist activists want the right to love a person of their choice. Muslim activists want to kill everyone who does not agree with islam. Therein lies the fundamental difference. I don't agree with defacing churches, but I do agree with the right to choose.

    ReplyDelete